tv Countdown With Keith Olbermann MSNBC December 16, 2009 8:00pm-9:00pm EST
wind. all the news and commentary now on "countdown." good evening from new york. dr. howard dean, the former vermont governor, chairman of the dnc, resuming his criticism of the senate health care reform bill today. as a result, the white house and senate democrats today assaulting him. in our fifth story on the "countdown," not a single angry word spoken today against the insurance companies for whom what remains would be a dream bill, or the politi bill,. against senator joe lieberman who has made it his mission to kill even the medicare buy-in compromise that he supported even three months ago, meant to be the consolation prize after the abandonment of the public option. ahead in this news hour, my special comment on the latest version of the senate health care reform bill. first, we begin with the latest details. governor dean this morning, repeating the assertion he made last night that democrats should just kill the bill entirely and
have the house start reconciliation to enact reform, real reform,ed a ee eed adding what they should have done in the first place. bernie sanders, the independent of vermont, saying, he thinks reconciliation is an absolutely appropriate route to go. more on his day in a moment. senator jay rockefeller today calling governor dean irresponsible. the white house, meanwhile, suggesting dr. dean is being irrational and does not understand the contents of the legislation. >> i don't know what piece of legislation he's reading. i would ask dr. dean, is it -- how better do you address those that don't have insurance? passing a bill that covers 30 million that don't currently have it or killing a bill? i don't think any rational person would say killing a bill makes a whole lot of sense at this point. >> no condescending words from the white house to characterize the behavior of two of the country's biggest labor groups which helped to elect the president, the sceu and the afl-cio, each holding executive
meetings to discuss whether they should still support the senate health care bill. meanwhile, senator landrieu, the conservative democrat of louisiana, offering her support for the compromised bill. republican minority leader mcconnell saying his caucasus of 40 senators is prepared to vote to kill the bill for good. until then, the strategy is delay, delay, delay, and repeat. senator coburn, republican of oklahoma, himself a doctor, today forcing the reading of a single-payer amendment presented by senator sanders, a 700-page document that would have taken an estimated eight hours to read aloud. >> the senator from vermont, mr. sanders, for himself and others, proposes an amendment number 2837 to amendment number 2786, beginning on page one, strike line six and all that follows to the end and insert the following -- >> i ask the amendment be considered as read. >> president, i object. >> objection is heard. >> b, table of contents.
the table of contents of this act is as follows. >> and so it continued. in the face of such inanity, and what would have forced the delay of a cloture vote on the defense appropriations bill, why do republicans hate the troops, senator sanders late this afternoon withdrew his amendment and let's say he was not happy about it. >> and the best the republicans can do is try to bring the united states government to a halt by forcing a reading of a 700-page amendment. that is an outrage! people can have honest disagreements, but in this moment of crisis, it is wrong to bring the united states government to a halt. >> and there is senator joe lieberman's singular role in stripping the health care bill of even its second-place trophy. asked today about lieberman's chairmanship of the homeland security and governmental affairs committee, in the wake of his decision not to support the expansion of medicare, one he once proposed, majority leader reid saying, "you have to understand, i don't get frustrated with anyone."
not so much senator lieberman himself, who tried to blame his shifting position on liberals, like congressman anthony weiner for being too enthusiastic about medicare expansion. "congressman weiner made a comment that medicare buy-in is better than a public option, it's the beginning of a road to single-payer." congressman weiner joins us now from the capitol. thank you for your time again, sir. >> thank you, keith. >> first of all, your response to senator lieberman? >> well, apparently he expects something like the stockholm syndrome to take hold here in congress, where we all start spouting the views of our hostage holders. the fact of the matter is, that amendment was included -- that change was included to expand medicare, not only because i liked it, but because senator lieberman himself proposed it. and the idea that he would be so capricious to simply say, because anthony weiner likes it, i'm going to ask that it be removed or not allow the bill to go forward. look, this has most puzzling. this whole process is. the very same people who say
they care about containing costs are the same people who said, take out the public option, who the cbo said would hold down costs. the people who say they are concerned about choice for consumers are the ones who they say they don't want the public option adding an additional choice. this has been a frustrating experience. and as i said this week, we worship at the altar of olympia snowe and stupak and i don't know why we're with outsourcing the writing of this bill to people who don't reflect the senate majority. >> do you support the bill in its current form and would you vote for or against it? >> we're going to go into a conference committee, and i've been reluctant to draw lines in the sand. and i have to tell you something, there's a lot of good things that still remain in the bill. but we've lost on three point importants here. one, the woman's right to choose has now been diminished in this bill. secondly, there are going to be taxing health plans, which i think is the opposite direction we want to go, encouraging private health care plans.
and third, that i haey've takene choice and competition that comes with the public option. this bill has gotten steadily worse through this process and no one's really stood up at the white house to say, enough is enough, these are our requirements. i'm keeping an open mind. i don't want to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. one of the things we've gotten into the habit of, we're holding a gun to our own head. we're negotiating against people who don't want there to be any health care improvements, and that's a difficult place to be. >> is a possible solution to this getting rid of the mandate to purchase, if that suddenly were out, would this senate bill as it stands now be a more viable prospect? >> well, the problem is, i happen to believe that there should be a mandate. i think that's one of the things that you do to spread the risk across a bigger body of people. i think it's fair to say to people, that just like we require you to get car insurance, we could require you to get health care insurance. but the problem is, we're doing some things now and saying, you know, what, if we only get this started, maybe we'll be table to make progress in future years.
well, we said the exact same things 44 years ago when medicare was passed. we haven't had any luck expanding that in the entire two generations since. so i think we really need to get it right this time, and that includes some of the things that are in the house bill that have not fallen out of the senate bill. >> lastly, about governor dean's comments, he's not saying "kill the bill and go home," he's saying, "kill the bill and get the good things that you can get passed through reconciliation done that way," and he's saying that that perhaps, with a clearer view of the past in the rearview mirror should have been the strategy all along. what are your thoughts about moving towards reconciliation at this point? >> i agree. i'm not sure i would go as far as governor dean as to whether or not we should stop in our tracks. but one thing is clear. we've heard that reconciliation for the purpose of clarity means a majority rules. that's what it means. it means what we're supposed to believe in this country and this congress. and we've been hearing that reconciliation, that process that would get us to a straight 51-vote majority rule was a last resort.
well, keith, we're at our last resort time on the calendar here. it's time to go get our best bull pen pitcher, which hopefully is the president of the united states, and say, let's get 51 votes. and if the republicans or the people in the 49 don't like that, hey, this is why we were elected, is to make these tough choices and get a majority vote here in the house and the senate. in that regard, i do agree with governor dean. >> congressman anthony weiner, democrat of new york, many thanks, and congratulations for being such a catalyst on this thing, and obviously, something that someone who has made senator lieberman change his mind about something he used to support. what an accomplishment. thank you, sir. >> thank you. >> for more on the politics, let's turn to our own lawrence o'donnell, contributor to "the huffington post," as well as a former chief of staff to the senate finance committee and, of course, a regular with us. he's in los angeles. lawrence, good evening. >> good to be here, keith. >> the white house, not at all angry with senator lieberman. not any member of the senate,
democrat or republican. instead, it was seemingly focused -- and understandably, this didn't just happen out of the ground, it wasn't orr grannic, they were asked questions about governor dean's remarks -- but that's what they spent the day dealing with. how does that make sense that he's the bad guy in this equation? >> because they fear howard dean and fear what howard dean represents. howard dean is speaking for a minimum of 100 democrats in the house who think about the senate bill exactly the same way that howard dean thinks about it. they have to make up their minds the question of how do i vote on this if this is what's going to come at us in the house after a conference with the senate. and howard dean is saying to senators and congressmen who faced that vote, the vote to cast is no. howard dean is a serious man of government, a governor, physician, former chairman of the democratic party. this is not some flake outside of the political establishment who's saying this.
it's a very scary crack in the democratic wall on this bill at this time. >> a variation of one of the questions i just asked the congressman. the white house and others have acted today as if governor dean was advocating giving up the whole process, bailing out, going home, saying, we'll try it again in 2 years, 5 years, 50 years. what he really said was, and you did the interview with him last night, it's time move through strategy, go to reconciliation. is governor dean's point of view being willfully -- is he being willfully misunderstood? >> oh, absolutely. because they feel themselves in the white house and in the senate one, two votes away from getting this thing through the senate. and that feels very close to the finish line. and the finish line becomes its own temptation and people, as howard dean made the point last night, people stop looking at what's in the bill, what it is they are actually trying to carry over this finish line. howard dean is saying, take another route, not abandon this
thing. i think the conceptual problem, keith, began with the notion, as it did in 1994, how do we preserve the for-profit health insurance industry? how do we do that legislatively? that is the driving force of the legislation. when that is the driving force, this is what it ends up looking like. >> the president guaranteed tonight in an interview with abc news done late this afternoon that the federal government, his phrase was, will go bankrupt. he didn't mean it was going to happen tomorrow, but he said it will go bankrupt if health care reform is not passed, this bill. he's never been that blunt before. he's talked a lot about the repercussim repercussions throughout the country, but has never said anything that strong. it is coincidental that he's suddenly using language that could have come out of the selling of the bank bailout to try to sell this version of this bill today? >> it's turning to scare tactics. the federal government is never going to go bankrupt. we're not going to let that happen. but this is the kind of scare tactic that the president seems
to be resorting to at this point. trying to convince people that there's something of extreme urgency here. it must be done by christmas eve. if there's anymore details you want to examine, sorry, we don't have time to do that. it has to be done by christmas eve. that's another point of howard dean's, is this does not have to be done by christmas eve. this is a thing that you get right. i mean, if someone has a broken leg, you set it correctly, you don't just give them a cane and say, start walking. so the president wants to speed this up. and people always -- look, when i was trying to run legislations through the senate, that's exactly what my strategy would be. i want to speed this up, move it as fast as i can. you're moving like a runner downfield in a football game. constantly going as fast as you can. but in this situation, it could produce a very bad result. >> got to do it tonight and don't remind anybody that they took all of august and let all that stuff happen then. lawrence o'donnell of msnbc and "the huffington post," as always, great thanks, my friend. >> thanks, keith. >> a special comment on the bill and the awful but unavoidable
health care reform that lets insurance companies move to states with with the weakest consumer protection laws that lets them charge the old four times what they charge the young, that allows them to charge 50% more for a pre-existing condition, that makes it law that you have to buy their product. wendell potter next on "countdown." and marcos moulitsas on the flawed impact of the 2010 elections and the one in 2012. announcer: today, guys with erectile dysfunction can be ready with another dosing option from cialis. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. so relax and take your time. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis.
side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. announcer: today you have options, 36-hour cialis or cialis for daily use. ask your doctor about cialis today so when the moment is right, you can be ready.
insurance companies, in our fourth story tonight, after the poor, the sick, and the uninsured have lost single payer, public option, medicare for 55 plus, it is time to checklist what the insurance companies get. the language that would have ended insurance companies' long-standing exemption from antitrust laws, laws that protect consumers against companies, that's gone. they would now face fewer controls, the law would let insurance companies start selling policies across state lines, meaning they could now flock to states with weak consumer protection, then do an end-around stronger state regulations across the country. they could charge people up to four times the premiums of young people. and remember how pre-existing conditions no longer matter? according to our next guest, the senate bill would let insurance companies charge you more if you have high blood pressure or high cholesterol, or who knows, a high tolerance for sticker shock. the ban on annual limits is gone. and now democrats are about to pass a law forcing you to buy this product, forcing families to hand over, how much? 10%, 15% of their annual income, 17% to insurance companies who
make more than that in profit. the result, american families face an de facto income tax hike that will paid directly to the richest people in history. then they will still face copays and still face bankruptcy if they max out. and for those who can't afford the new insurance company tax, the insurance companies will be paid with government subsidies, $450 billion with over ten years, yet another transfer of wealth from taxpayers to insurance companies. let's turn now to wendell potter, once the head of public relations for cigna, today a senior fellow on health care at the center for media and democracy. welcome back to the program, sir. >> thank you, keith. >> we'll do specifics, but first that generalization. dr. dean called this bill a bailout for the insurance industry. as its instituted now, is it such? >> it has everything the industry wants and been stripped of things the industry didn't like, so it's absolutely a big gift to the industry. >> what about mr. gibbs' argument that insurance companies would not be fighting against this bill if they liked it so much? >> you know, they're not stupid.
they love this bill. they can certainly think of ways that they would make it even better for them by making those of us who are older pay five times as much for our policies. they could do a few things like that, penalize us even more for not buying their product. so, yeah, they could fight for a bit more, but they've been fighting to shape this bill and have been very successful in doing that. >> tell me if my thinking is right on this, having experienced it every day firsthand for much of your live. if fighting it has resulted in 75% of the meaningful reform being stripped out of the bill, surely the lesson of the industry is keep fighting it in the same way and maybe you can get the other 25%. >> you're exactly right there. that's what they're wanting to do. they're strategy has worked and it's been a strategy that's really outfoxed white house, outfoxed the democratic leadership. they knew exactly what the end game would look like. they knew who they had to go after to try to make sure that they got what they want. they've got senators lieberman and landrieu being out there
shilling for them, so they've gotten what they wanted. they knew what would be happening, what they needed to do to get the bill passed the way they wanted to. >> can you explain a bit the status of caps and how much customers would pay and where the bill stands, in fact, on pre-existing conditions? >> yeah. with pre-existing conditions, that would be outlawed, but the way that the insurance companies would get around that would be, they would be enabled to charge people who have certain health factors, as it's called in this bill, up to 50% more. if you've got high blood pressure or high cholesterol reading. so that is, you know, just one way to get around doing that. plus, charging people who are older much, much more than people who are younger is another way. because, clearly, people have more medical bills as they get older. so it's just giving up one thing, knowing that they can make up the money some other way. and the other thing is, they're shifting -- continuing to shift
more and more of the financial burden, the financial cost of health care, to consumers. under this bill, middle income people would have to pay an average of 17% of their income on health care. if someone in the family is chronically ill, that would go up to 22%. it's astonishing to me to hear the president say that the country might go bankrupt if this bill doesn't pass. what is absolutely certain is that if this bill passes in this way, many millions of people will be facing bankruptcy. >> the mandate to buy this insurance, everything else of significance has been pulled out of this bill, i think, everything writ large, anyway, except this mandate. would the bill be palatable, would it be kind of small "r" reform if there were no mandate in here? >> you know, the president, when he was campaigning said he was against this mandate. because he said, why should we force people to buy a product they can't afford? and he also campaigned, despite what senator landrieu was saying today, she was apparently trying to rewrite history, he campaigned in favor of a public
option. yeah, i think this bill is to the point that we are going to be forcing people to buy a product they simply cannot afford. and going back to what the president said in the campaign, i don't think that's right. >> wendell potter, former insurance executive at cigna who's done such great work on this throughout the months. many thanks, sir. >> thank you. >> markos moulitsas on the political ramifications next year in 2012. and a special comment, this is not health, this is not care, this is certainly not reform. ever worn your clothes in the shower? if you're using other moisturizing body washes, you might as well be. you see, their moisturizer sits on top of skin, almost as if you're wearing it.
only new dove deep moisture has nutriummoisture, a breakthrough formula with natural moisturizers... that can nourish deep down. it's the most effective natural nourishment ever. new dove deep moisture with nutriummoisture. superior natural nourishment for your skin. because with national, i roll past the counter... and choose any car in the aisle. choosing your own car?
somewhere in america, there's a home by the sea powered by the wind on the plains. there's a hospital where technology has a healing touch. there's a factory giving old industries new life. and there's a train that got a whole city moving again. somewhere in america, the toughest questions are answered every day. because somewhere in america, 69,000 people spend every day answering them. siemens. answers. ing about osteoporosis you don't already know. it runs in families - my mother has it, and now i have it. so even though i tried to keep my bones strong, it wasn't enough. now, once-mofthly boniva is helping me do more. it didn't just stop my bone loss. boniva worked with my body to stop and reverse my bone loss.
and studies show, after one year on boniva, nine out of ten women stopped and reversed theirs, too. (announcer) don't take boniva if you have low blood calcium, severe kidney disease, or can't sit or stand for at least one hour. follow dosing instructions carefully. stop taking boniva and tell your doctor if you have difficult or painful swallowing, chest pain or severe or continuing heartburn, as these may be signs of serious upper digestive problems. if jaw problems or severe bone, joint, and/or muscle pain develop, tell your doctor. you've got one body and one life, so don't wait. ask your doctor if boniva can help you stop losing and start reversing. (announcer) for a free trial offer call 1-800-4-boniva or visit boniva.com when it comes to italian sauce, some people prefer this jar. but more people prefer this sauce. winner of the blind taste test. the sweet and savory taste of prego. it's in there.
it's not just the policy of passing a potentially bad health care bill versus passing nothing at all, it's also the politics, obviously. in our third story in the "countdown," if the democratic majority passes nothing, it might be swept off office in the 2010 midterm elections. and if the democratic majority passes this health care bill, it might be swept out of office in the 2010 midterm elections. it's not just the president who has taken a slide in the latest nbc news/"wall street journal" poll, though his approval rating has dropped to 47%, down from
51% in october, with 46% disapproval. the health care reform bill takes a huge beating. only 32% think it is a good idea. only 41% think it is better than to pass it versus keeping the current system. and for the first time in polling this past year's health care reform effort, more people say it is better to pass nothing. and that declined from previous polls owes mostly not to critics of reform, but to advocates. most respondents find a health care bill without a public option unacceptable. and while respondents like the medicare buy-in idea, that, of course, has been dropped too. on the question of the 2010 midterms and this party should control congress, democrats holding on to a slim lead. let's turn now to the author of the daily kos, markos moulitsas.
which fact trumps the other, that this has become a dreadful bill, but this dreadful bill might put a dent in the reality of americans die nor lack of better insurance. >> it's a passionate question and passions are running high on either side of this debate. i don't think we're quite ready to concede that this bill has to be this bad. i think everybody's resigned to the fact that we're not going to get a good bill. but does it really have to be this bad? i don't think we're ready to concede that yet. the house still gets to weigh in, and hopefully we can salvage something out of this. not making it better, but making it less bad than it currently is. >> saying we get to that point, is that better, political we, a bill that might be tough to defend, but does it necessarily start eating through the floor the moment it hits the floor, or better going to the midterms having passed nothing in terms of health care? >> well, either way, it's a
lose/lose proposition. that's what makes it so difficult. if you pass something -- if you pass nothing, everybody's going to be angry. democrats will be accused rightfully of being incapable of governing, that much is clear. but if we do pass something bad, that means every bad element of this bill gets basically put on the backs of democrats. they own health care. every rate increase and so on. it's bad. not to mention that the kind of people that helped democrats win the last two cycles, the people that knock on doors and make the phone calls and donate the money, those people are not that excited about this. they're feeling burnt, they're feeling betrayed. and if they don't turn out, i don't think things are going to be very good for democrats next year. >> enthusiasm gap. obviously, it's devastating at moment, the spirit -- dispirit, i guess you would call it, is how you would describe it. is there something else that could be done to reenergize that democratic base -- it's next year, 11 months away now, next year's midterms? >> republicans are going to be
energized no matter what. they're raring to go. they think obama is a socialist country that wants to kill your grandmother. they're ready to vote no matter what. how do you turn out democrats? i guess that's the big question. and i think the first thing you do is you stop pretending to negotiate with republicans when republicans have no intention of negotiating in good faith and you try to pass good bills. and you may lose some of those votes, but that's okay, because then we know who are obstructing and we can make an electoral case why we need to elect better democrats and more democrats. that's what you have to do. but capitulating and conceding and negotiating with people who have no interest in negotiating with good faith, that's a sure recipe for turning people skbin nonvoters. i'm going to vote and probably most people watching this show are probably going to vote. but it's those people that are peripherally engaged in politics. they're the ones most at risk of not turning out. >> what, ultimately, the way this thing has -- the word of the moment is trajectory -- the
trajectory of this entire process, what do you see as the worst-case scenario at the end of that trajectory for the president? is it the base not turning out for him specifically anymore? >> i think the danger for obama is much nearer, is that people don't turn out in 2010 and suddenly he's faced -- not with republican majorities, i don't see republicans taking over, but i definitely see diminished democratic majorities and a very, very scared group of democrats. because, you know, democrats are a very scared bunch of people to begin with. if you give them an electoral defeat, and things may become even worse. so obama's unable to pass anything, and basically rendering him an irrelevant president. and i think he aspires to much more than that. and hopefully he sees the danger in the base not turning out next year and does something about getting democrats excited about turning out and voting and defending our majorities. >> markos moulitsas of the daily kos, thanks very much. health care reform without
the reform, without the care, and clearly without the health. a special comment on howard dean's assertion that it is time to kill the bill and move to reconciliation, pass whatever you can do through reconciliation and do so. the quote, "i hope president obama didn't mean it the way it came across when he suggested that president bush was too triumphant in his rhetoric when talking about war." there is loyal, but there's also just plain dumb. "worst persons" ahead. and dick armey was so mad at rachel he could not even pronounce her name. if a former congressman holds a news conference and nobody shows up, was it really a news conference?
it's good to be rewarded r your purchases. happy, membership rewards pointsfrs can used for over a million things y wt... and and because points you'don't expiret. you can ke them to use whenever you like. can your card say that? that's why i use covergirl's simply ageless makeup with olay regenerist serum. a department store brand can glob up in lines
and actually make you look older. simply ageless makes you look amazing. from olay and easy, breezy, beautiful covergirl. yeah. would you like a pony ? ye ! ( cluck, cluck, cluck ) oh, wowww ! that's fun ! you didn't say could have a real one. well, you didn't ask. even kids know when it's wrong to hold out on somebody. why don't banks ? we're ally, a new bank that alerts you when your money could be worki harder d earning more. it's just the right thing to do. special comment on senate consideration of hr-3590. it is still called a health care reform bill, though why that is has never been less clear than it is tonight. and much-needed comic relief.
from dana perino and from michele bachmann, thinks the charge of the light brigade was a win. "worst persons" and then the comment next on "countdown." i go down to the pool for a swim... get out and dance... even play a little hide-n-seek. i'm breathing better... with spiriva. announcer: spiriva is the only once-daily inhaled maintenance treatmen for both forms of pd, which includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. i take it every day. it keeps my airways open.. to help me breathe better all day long. and it's not a steroid. announcer: spiriva does not replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms. stop taking spiriva and call your doctor if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells, you gehives, or have vision changes or eye pain. tell your doctor if you have glaucoma, problems passing urine or an enlarged prostate, as these may worsen with spiriva. also discuss the medicines you take, even eye drops. side effects may include dry mouth, constipation and trouble passing urine. every day could be a good day to breat better.
announcer: ask your doctor if once-daily spiriva is right for you. special comment on hr-3590 and a pivotal moment for a president, that's next. first, number two story, tonight's "worst persons" in the world. jay warld, the city's managers of subways and buses and stuff, the authority today approved budget cuts, closing two subway
lines, reducing trains, charging school kids more to take public transportation to school. this is a result of the shocking, total surprise budget shortfall that the mta has had every 18 months or so for the last four decades. the latest, $400 million they suddenly discovered last week they just didn't have. i know this is a local thing, but this has been going on since i was a kid. it is the biggest running scam in this town since they caught boss tweed. our runner-up, congresswoman michele bachmann. although we really must thank her for unintentionally lightening the mood tonight, compared a code red anti-health care reform rally to a moment in history i guess she thought she understood. it's the charge of the light brigade. you know, like the poem, half a league, half a league, half a league onward, all in the valley of death 600. a little over 600 cavalry men on october 25th, 1854. at least half of them were killed, injured or captured, largely because the 600 were
attacking 650 million and 40 siege guns. reportly, cardgan was ordered to make the charge. congresswoman, if you want to compare your nut bastigs to the light brigade, have a nice ride. but our winner, dana perino. when she was still on the job, i wondered, was she specifically selected because she had no clue. had she been trained to not have a clue. but after the president told cbs that he didn't wave the flag at west point about afghanistan because he thought, "one of the mistakes that was made over the last eight years is for us to have a triumphant sense about war," ms. perino followed up on fix news by saying, "i hope president obama didn't mean it the way it came across, but when he suggested that president bush was too triumphant in his rhetoric when talking about war --," ms. perino, over here, ma'am, i'd like to show you a
photograph and ask you if you recognize when or where it's from. hmm? no? no clue? any idea who the guy was? seriously? you're hoping president obama didn't think president bush was too triumphant in his rhetoric when talking about war? i mean, even mr. bush has even said mission accomplished was now a mistake. dana, is my head attached to my shoulders or did i leave it at home by accident, perino, today's worse person in the world. (announcer) nothing matches that dentist level of clean. but you can take home that dentist smooth clean feeling with oral-b rechargeable brushes. dentist inspired cupping action sweeps away up to twice as much plaque as a regular manual brush. oral-b rechargeable brushes. starting at $22.
the moisturizer in other body washes sits on top of skin. only new dove has nutriummoisture... which can nourish deep down. new dove body wash with nutriummoisture. superior natural nourishment for your skin. we decide to turn in early. we just know. announcer: finding the moment that's right for you both can take some time. that's why cialis gives men with erectile dysfunction options: 36-hour cialis or cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may
include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. announcer: cialis for daily use or 36-hour cialis. ask your doctor if cialis is right for you, so when the moment is right, you can be ready. because with national, i roll past the counter... and choose any car in the aisle. choosing your own car? now that's a good call. go national. go like a pro.
special comment on the latest version of hr-3590, the senate health care reform bill. to again quote churchill after munich, as i did six nights ago on this program, i will begin by saying the most unpopular and most unwelcome thing that we have sustained a total and unmitigated defeat without a war. last night on this program, howard dean said that with the appeasement of mr. lieberman of connecticut by the abandonment of the medicare buy-in, he could no longer support hr-3590. dr. dean's argument is informed, cogent, heartbreaking, and unanswerable. seeking the least common denominator, senator reid has found it, especially the least part. this is not health, this is not care, this is certainly not reform. i bless the sherrod browns and ron wydens and jay rockefellers and whitehouses those who have fought for real reform. they have done their jobs and served their nations, but they are now seeking to reanimate a
corpse, killed by the republicans and by a political game played in the senate and in the white house by men and women who have now proved themselves poorly equipped for that fight. the men of the current moment have lost to the mice of history. they must now not make the defeat worse by passing a hollow shell of a bill, just for the sake of a big stage signing ceremony. this bill slowly bled to death of the political equivalent of the leashes that were once thought state of the art medicine is now little more than a series of microscopically minor tweaks of a system that is the real-life here and now version of the malarkey of the town halers, the american insurance cartel is the death panel and this senate bill does nothing to destroy it, or even to satiate it. it merely decrees that our underpriunde underprivileged, our sick, our elderly, our middle class can be fed into it as human sacrifices to the great law of corporate voraciousness at a profit-per-victim of 10 cents on
the dollar instead of the current 20. even before the support columns of reform were knocked down, one by one, with the kind of passive defense that would embarrass a touch football player, single-payer, the public option, the medicare buy-in, before they vanished, the congressional budget office estimated that the part of the bill that would require you to buy insurance unless you could prove you could not afford it would cost a family of four with a household income of $54,000 a year 17% of that income, $9,000 a year, just for the insurance. that was with a public option. that was with some kind of check on the insurance companies. that was before, as howard dean pointed out, the revelation that the cartel will still be able to charge older people more than others, will, at the at least, now be able to charge much more, maybe 50% more, for people with pre-existing conditions. pre-existing conditions. you know, like being alive. you have just agreed to purchase a product. if you do not, you will be breaking the law and subject to a fine.
you have no control over how much you will pay for that product. the government will have virtually no control over how much the company will charge for that product. the product is designed like the monty python sketch about the insurance companies "never pay" policy, which, you know, if you never claim is very worthwhile. but you had to claim, and well, there it is. and who do we have to blame for this? well, there are a enough villains to go around. men and women who, in a just world, would be the next to get sick and have to sell their homes or their memories or their futures, just to keep themselves alive. just to keep their children alive against the implacable enemy of american society, the insurance cartel. mr. grassley of iowa has lied and fomented panic and fear. mr. demint of south carolina has forgotten he represents people and not just a political party. mr. baucus of montana has operated as a virtual agent for the industry he is charged with regulates. mr. nelson of nebraska has not only derailed reform, he has
tried to exploit it to overturn a supreme court decision that is in this context, frankly, none of his goddamned business. they say they have done what they have done for the most important, the most fiscally prudent, the most gloriously phrased, the most inescapable of reasons. but mostly, they have done it for the money. lots and lots of money. and the insurance companies and the pharmacological companies and the other health care companies who have slowly, deliberately, and effectively taken this country over. which brings us to mr. lieberman of connecticut. the one man at the center of this farcical perversion of what a government is supposed to be. out of pique, out of revenge, out of betrayal of his earlier, wiser, saner self, he has sold untold hundreds of thousands of into pain and fear and privation and slavery -- for money. he has been bought and sold by the insurance lobby. he has become a senatorial
prostitute. and sadly, the president of the united states has not provided the leadership his office demands. he has badly misjudged the country's mood at all ends of the spectrum. there is no middle to coalesce here, sir. there are only the uninformed, the bought off, and the vast suffering majority for whom the urgency of now is a call from a collection agency or a threat of rescission of policy or a warning of expiration of service. sir, your hands-off approach, while nobly intended and some day applicable to the reality of our improved nation, enabled the public humiliation that was the town halls with and the neanderthal stupidity of congressman wilson and the street walking of mr. lieberman. instead of continuing this snipe hunt for the endangered and possibly extinct creature bipartisanship, you need to push the republicans around or cut them out or both. you need to threaten democrats
like baucus and the others with the ends of their careers in the party. instead, those democrats have threatened you and the republicans have pushed you and cut you out. mr. president, the line between compromise and compromised is an incredibly fine one. any reform bill enrages the right and provides it with the war cry around which it will rally its mindless legions in the midterms and in '12, but this republican knee-jerk inflexibility provides an incredible opportunity to you, sir, and an incredible license. on april 6th, 2003, i was approached by two drunken young men at a baseball game and one of them started to ask for an autograph and the other one stopped him by shouting, "screw him, he's a liberal." this program had been on the air for three weeks. it had to that point consisted of brief correspondents to correspondents in iraq. i had not covered news full-time for more than four years.
i could not fathom on what factual base i was being called a liberal, let alone being sworn at for being such. only later did it dawn on me that it didn't matter why. it only mattered if he was going to be mindlessly criticized for something, the reaction would be identical if i did nothing that engendered it or if i stood for something that engendered it. mr. president, they're calling you a socialist, a communist, a marxist. you could be further to the right on this than reagan, and this h k bill, the bailout for the insurance industry, it sure invites the reagan comparison, and they will still call you names. if you are going to be called a socialist no matter what you, you have been given freedom to know what you do is just. the firestorm will be the same. so why not give the haters, as the cliche goes, something to
cry about? but with that is the reaction from democrats and independents. you have riven them, sir. any bill will engender criticism, but this bill costs you the left and now anyone who has to owny up 17% of its family's income to buy this equivalent of mobster protection money. some speaking for you have called the public option a fetish. they may be right, but to stay with this uncomfortable language, this bill is less fetish and more bondage. nothing short of your re re-election and the re-election of dozens of democrats in the house and senate hinges on large part of this bill. make it palatable or make it go away or make yourself ready, not merely for a horrifying campaign in 2012, but for the distinct possibility also of a primary challenge. befitting the season, these are not the shadows of the things that will be, but the shadows of the things that will be.
there is only one redemption possible. the mandate in this bill under which we are required to buy insurance must be stripped out. the bill now is little more than a legally mandated delivery of the middle class and those whose dreams of joining it slip ever further away into a kind of chicago stockyards of insurance. make enough money to take care of yourself and your family and you must buy insurance on the insurers' terms or face a fine. this provision must go. it is, above all else, immoral and a betrayal of the people who elected you, sir. you must now announce that you will veto any bill lacking an option or buy-in, but containing a mandate. and senator reid, put the public option back in, or the medicare buy-in, or both, or single-payer, for that matter. let lieberman and ben nelson and baucus and the republicans vote their lack of conscious and preclude the 60 ayes. let them commit the political suicide instead of you. let mr. lieberman kill this bill
and then turn his republican friends only to find out they hate him more than the democrats do. let him stagger off the public stage to go work for the insurance industry, as if he is not doing that now. and then take every worthwhile provision of health care reform you can and pass it by reconciliation however and whenever you can. >> the senate bill with the mandate must be defeated. if not in the senate, in the house. health care reform that benefits the people at the cost of the industry are intolerable. and if still the bill and this heinous mandate become law, there is yet further reaction required. i call on all those whose conscience urges them to fight to use the only weapon that will be left to us if this bill as currently constituted becomes law. we must not buy federally mandated insurance if this cheesy counterfeit of reform is all we can buy.
no single-payer, no sale. no public option, no sale. no medicare buy-in, no sale. i am one of the self-insured, albeit, by choice, and i hereby pledge that i will not buy this perversion of health care reform. pass this at your peril, senators, and sign it at yours, mr. president. i will not buy this insurance. brand me a lawmaker, if you choose, fine me if you will, jail me if you must. but if the medicare buy-in goes but the mandate stays, the people who fought so hard and so sincerely to bring sanity to this system must kill this mutated, ugly version of their dream, because those elected by us to act for us have forgotten what must be the golden rule of health care reform. it is the same rule to which physicians are bound by oath -- first, do no harm. good night and good luck.
and now here is my very dear friend, rachel maddow. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, keith, i know that was a difficult conclusion for you to arrive at. thank you for doing it. and thank you at home for tuning in. we begin tonight with how we got here. and by here, in this case, i mean, here, what you're looking at right next to me here is what happened for nearly three straight hours on the senate floor today. a senate clerk reading a 767-page amendment to the health reform bill out loud, word for painstaking word, grinding senate business to a halt. it was the latest anti-health reform delay tactic. this one deployed by republican senator tom coburn of oklahoma. two long hours and 43 long minutes later, after 139 pages had already been read aloud, the sponsor of the amendment that was being read, vermont senator bernie sanders, withdrew it. and in doing so, he made no effort to hide his disgust.
>> we've got two wars, we've got global warming, we have a $12 trillion national debt and the best the republicans can do is try to bring the united states government to a halt. by forcing a read of a 700-page amendment. that is an outrage. people can have honest disagreements, but in this moment of crisis, it is wrong to bring the united states government to a halt. >> the republican anti-health reform strategy of delay, delay, delay, delay is one that they're now openly bragging about. republican senator jim demint tweeting about today's senate floor stunt. "if reid won't slow down this debate, we will do it for him." apparently, dissatisfied with just being able to vote against health reform, republican tactics against it are getting, frankly, more radical. since the big "read the 700-page bill" stunt failo